Tarkan - admin power abuse

[FulToN_619]

Nickname: MKs.Tarkan
Time and date (if known): Yesterday
Suspected method of cheat/exploit/rule break used: Abusing Admin powers By Tarkan
Evidence: https://youtu.be/tWMWQ4O4ook
Additional information: I don't know why but that admin Tarkan always try himself to showoff whenever if we kill him or try to Dealt him with duels he just use his cmds to ban innocent users over LW and he did yesterday with me. He never be friendly to any newbie over lw i saw him several time abusing his slogan powers for no purpose which is insane, Hope management will do Justice fair enough so he will try to avoid this in Future.

[morphine]

so what is this 'evidence' supposed to be showing?

[FulToN_619]

so what is this 'evidence' supposed to be showing?

He banned me for the reason : Spawn Killing Is he bother to tell me in which point did i done that?

That video is of that time gameplay.

[morphine]

Tarkan please respond to the above

[Tarkan]

The video you posted is a cut version. At the time I've banned you, Quetzal was behind you but on the video you posted it's shown that a blue blip is approaching just right when the video is about to end. Your words:

[22:35] <+`Fulton-Phone> .quetzal was also with me dude
[22:35] <&RostySpoon> `Fulton-Phone: quetzal was also with me dude

[22:38] <+`Fulton-Phone> .kramer quetzal was also with me
[22:38] <&RastySpoon> `Fulton-Phone: kramer quetzal was also with me

[22:38] <+`Fulton-Phone> .but he only banned me
[22:38] <&RastySpoon> `Fulton-Phone: but he only banned me

[22:58] <+`Fulton-Phone> .kramer?
[22:58] <&RustySpoon> `Fulton-Phone: kramer?

[22:58] <+`Fulton-Phone> .https://youtu.be/tWMWQ4O4ook
[22:58] <&RastySpoon> `Fulton-Phone: https://youtu.be/tWMWQ4O4ook

Your video doesn't prove anything except that you were camping my spawn (which is allowed) and killing me. This is just a lead to what happened later on. There were two kills or so which were indeed spawn kills as you approached too close and I wasn't able to move away (not even as much as in the video) which lead to the ban. The reason why I didn't ban QuetzaL is because he didn't come close as you did, he stood at the fence and by looking at the position where the red skin spawns he wasn't able to commit spawn killing (also because using a M4 isn't going to kill me right away due to the spawn protection (unlike spaz/punch where I get bugged and I can't move) and by the time the spawn protection is gone I'm out of the spawn position and he's free to kill).

[FulToN_619]

Well I would like to call [SS]Quetzal he was there with me management should ask him what is the truth.

[morphine]

if Queztal has anything to add and wants to add it, please ask him to post here

[Quetzal]

Yes, I was in what happened and fulton did not spawnkilling he was just waiting to kill him after 5 seconds of tarkan spawn, then tarkan ban him

[FulToN_619]

Yes, I was in what happened and fulton did not spawnkilling he was just waiting to kill him after 5 seconds of tarkan spawn, then tarkan ban him

Yes as you can see in my video i was waiting for tarkan's shot

[FulToN_619]

Bump

[KaraN.]

just now rage-banned a guy, who casually poped his head while running and he claimed it to be "car glitch" while I was there, seeing it all happen

[SaM.]

Yeah hes banning player without any evidence and says i don't need evidence since i am an admin.
First he banned wr*blix(ex staff member) for aimbot and that was a poor judgement and now he rage banned fulton,fullfilled and karan.

I request management to imply some rules on tarken banning players without any evidence.

p.s- he could have taken a single screenshot when fulton was spawnkilling tarkan but he didn't because it was a rageban.

[morphine]

I'm locking this for the time being

the management team is looking into this and I will respond with a decision as soon as possible

[morphine]

as much as I'd want to reprimand Tarkan for any wrongdoing (and I really, really do), neither of the sets of evidence provided by either Fulton or Karan show any abuse of power as they both lack in certain material for me to make an objective conclusion

therefore, this report is denied