littlewhitey's Servers Forum (SA-MP/VC-MP/MTA/Zomboid)
Recycle Bin => Suggestions (2008-2011) => SA-MP Archive (2015) => SA-MP Archive => Recycle Bin => Accepted Suggestions => Topic started by: AJP on February 07, 2010, 01:42:48 PM
-
So many reasons.. lots of the ww'ers would be free.
1 - Would place another level of balance between ww and rw, and now with 4shot allowed, it's even more needed imo
2 - WW Clans use cbug, more clans is more fun
3 - Gives admins a break
4 - Players like it
5 - Doesn't make a difference for a nub to be killed by cbug or by sawn/tec. Actually they put up more of a fight against a cbugger
6 - No obligation to use it.. it's your choice
7 - In need of players
8 - Cake
Btw, I'm posting this as a player, not in the name of the admin team. It's something that occured to me and alot of other players but it's not anything that's been recently discussed within the staff.
-
Straight yes from me.
-
HELL YES.
-
sure thing, allow it
-
Yes, allow it.
-
Would be a lot of sliding cause of .3, but yes
-
Yes!
-
That mean 2 shoots with sawn will be allowed?
-
That mean 2 shoots with sawn will be allowed?
Wtf does 2 shot have anything to do with cbug?
-
That mean 2 shoots with sawn will be allowed?
Wtf does 2 shot have anything to do with cbug?
lol no just ask,and no from me for cbug
-
Yes allow it :) Scott i hope you win this xD
Look at it this way:Half of the player son the server maybe even more go on SFR or another ww server just to practice c-bug.
We would have alot more players for that and would be helpful for liek scott said.When ur sawns vs a deagle u have more chance to win with c-bug.
-
you dont want cbug robably because you dont know it lol.
I say big yes, this could help abit.
-
you dont want cbug robably because you dont know it lol.
I say big yes, this could help abit.
Orly? ti isto mislis da si najpametniji i da sve znas :-\
yes he knows a lot since he wants cbug to be accepted.
voted yes
-
Voted yes.
-
i have voted yes but i still don't know how to use c-bug.... :( :(
-
i have voted yes but i still don't know how to use c-bug.... :( :(
If ever i see you im gonna show you how to do it.
-
YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!! YES!
No waiting for money and i always liked playing lw's with deagle and with c-bug i can spree them down and have a higher chance to kill ppl with sawn/uzi MORE ww clans will come here cuz it so much better with c-bug
+1
i saw scott playing on sfr thats where the idea is from am i rite?
-
YESSSS!
-
My vote is between Yes and No, No because when some randoms on the server and dunno even what C-bug is they keep reporting the c-bugger for cheats, and even if he knew whats the C-bug he wont be able to use it, so thats not fair for him.
Yes because it would be fun to use it D:, so half no half yes for me lol.
-
cbug (this one was a lil scripted, but it looks pretty much the same):
SAMP- Fast Rapid Fire (cbug) with no clip script (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFRGf_hwHJM#)
-
heey thats meth :p greetings from watergirl 8)
[SAE]Zegro vs Eg0ist (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVi3PcP1FkM#)
beat that.
-
i have voted yes but i still don't know how to use c-bug.... :( :(
Search cbug sa:mp on youtube, you'll know
-
ohk.... i will look for it....and by the time it is allowed on the server i will try to master it...
-
Has been denied for so many times, but I think it'd be a nice addition to da server, yes here.
-
i got this video where c-bug is explained with 2 shots also. so igonre 2 shot and see c-bug.
explained very nicely.
SA:MP 2 Shot & Crouch-Bug Tutorial [GERMAN] (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCsSrovav2Y#ws)
-
Face it we need something new (C-BUG) everyone agreed atleast for now so why not accept it?
-
everyone agreed atleast for now so why not accept it?
true, most votes are yes, that means most of us or say almost everyone need this (c-bug) on the server.....
-
Face it we need something new (C-BUG) everyone agreed atleast for now so why not accept it?
Dude, it has been suggested today. They cant make a (imo big) decision that fast.
And no from me, it takes all the ban-risking fun away! a what the hell, i vote yes
-
i saw scott playing on sfr thats where the idea is from am i rite?
Nah I've been wanting this for like.. ever.
-
Voted yes, it will make the admins job easier and decrease amount of cocky players who cbug just to get banned.
-
Face it we need something new (C-BUG) everyone agreed atleast for now so why not accept it?
a what the hell, i vote yes
Thats the spirit!
-
Voted yes
accepted! xDDDDD
-
sure, we can try it out
-
Voted yes, it will make the admins job easier and decrease amount of cocky players who cbug just to get banned.
x2
but dont forget to mention the cocky donators :-\
it would help to restore a balance between rw and ww weapons and probably bring a few more ww-players on the server, yes
-
Why not?
Vote Yes.
-
Prepare for my cbug bitches, i will be unstoppable!
-
Yes. Not because I need it, ill probably still keep using rw. I voted yes, cuz even more than no cbug annoys me the low ammount of players. Allow ppl to cbug and advertise it everywhere you can, thats my suggestion :P
-
Sry but I don´t like c-bug :-\
-
I don't like it either even though I know it's a game. Keep it real for as much as possible. So reload your gun like everybody else if that isn't too much asked. It's called c-bug, a bug, and that shouldn't be exploited.
-
Big yes from me.
-
I don't like it either even though I know it's a game. Keep it real for as much as possible. So reload your gun like everybody else if that isn't too much asked. It's called c-bug, a bug, and that shouldn't be exploited.
There's lodes of bugs people use in the game and are not only allowed but well looked upon at... The fact that you switch weapons to not reload, that can be considered a bug; the fact that a car explodes earlier if you keep shooting it after in flames could be considered a bug; /stop for jumping out of cars; sync shooting; side shooting and on and on.
This game is full of bugs and imo, cbug is one that makes it more fun. Because if this mod were 100% bug free it would be shit, full of autoaimers and no fun whatsoever. SA:MP is by far not a realistic game and cbug aint the only name people have for it.
-
Finally....i dont think that there is need for poll,this is accepted
...Yes from me cause am big wwer :P
-
yes!
-
I agree it's a game full of bugs. But the main purpose of the game is the shooting, therefore I don't support c-bug. I guess it might be fun but there are servers that allow it. I just like it the way it is now. For example 2-shot with shotgun isn't allowed but some people love it, while others get upset by it. This should be allowed too when c-bug gets allowed?
Btw I don't support 2-shot, it's just the part of 'realism' that we have should be contained imo.
-
Cbug is bigger than 2shot from what I've seen within this community.
-
I dont get the point of 2 shot.Its about same thing as 4 shot.Anyway C-bug is usefull and fun to use.If u would sue it you would notice that c-bug is much more fun then plain deagle.Anyway i Voted yes and that wont change.i think that we wont have any problems getting it allowed exept if the lw staff are all against.I know its a bugg but look like scott sai du already use alot of bugs that you dont know off.If u dont like it dont use it.But dont punish the whole server for only 25 poeple or so.
-
I really dislike these bugs: switching, /stop, cbug, fireing a burned car to make it explode too fast, enter a vehicle to kill the driver bug, no reload bug,....
Sorry if I call them bugs, you can call this "SKILLZ" if you feel better.
I am pretty sure we wont get many ppl from other servers just because of allowing "c-bug". Most of them do not even know is not allowed here.
and I can not understand why ppl want this cause it would be less work for us admins (in times where only a few players are online)
and I cant understand to allow c-bug to decrease amount of cocky players who cbug just to get banned.
wtf?
They just will find other things to get banned for. And why should we decrease the ammount of cocky players? Cause we dont like them? Isnt it good to have ppl on deathmatch server, who u dont like?
And we dont need even less players.
But I guess we will allow this, because:
In times of helikilling/drivebying/switching/ /stop abuse ... it does not make real sense to disallow c-bug.
If we do, we should also think about 2shot. The discussion will come soon or later, why not talk direct over it.
When we allowed switching, managment members said we will never allow c-bug. And now...
-
what is with everybody and relating cbug to 2shot... o_o
Also SUPERBAD:
Sorry if I call them bugs, you can call this "SKILLZ" if you feel better.
It's not about feeling better, but some bugs such as cbug do require skill to master.
I am pretty sure we wont get many ppl from other servers just because of allowing "c-bug". Most of them do not even know is not allowed here.
Wrong. People that already knew about the server might be more eager to come knowing that they can fight how they're used to without getting banned.
and I can not understand why ppl want this cause it would be less work for us admins (in times where only a few players are online)
and I cant understand to allow c-bug to decrease amount of cocky players who cbug just to get banned.
wtf?
They just will find other things to get banned for. And why should we decrease the ammount of cocky players? Cause we dont like them? Isnt it good to have ppl on deathmatch server, who u dont like?
And we dont need even less players.
These two sorta answer themselves. You see I'd rather be shooting at someone who I dislike and have a server with higher player count than no players at all.
Also I'd like to add that the current vote pretty much speaks for itself.
-
I really dislike these bugs: switching, /stop, cbug, fireing a burned car to make it explode too fast, enter a vehicle to kill the driver bug, no reload bug,....
Sorry if I call them bugs, you can call this "SKILLZ" if you feel better.
I am pretty sure we wont get many ppl from other servers just because of allowing "c-bug". Most of them do not even know is not allowed here.
and I can not understand why ppl want this cause it would be less work for us admins (in times where only a few players are online)
and I cant understand to allow c-bug to decrease amount of cocky players who cbug just to get banned.
wtf?
They just will find other things to get banned for. And why should we decrease the ammount of cocky players? Cause we dont like them? Isnt it good to have ppl on deathmatch server, who u dont like?
And we dont need even less players.
But I guess we will allow this, because:
In times of helikilling/drivebying/switching/ /stop abuse ... it does not make real sense to disallow c-bug.
If we do, we should also think about 2shot. The discussion will come soon or later, why not talk direct over it.
When we allowed switching, managment members said we will never allow c-bug. And now...
Im with u :)
-
i ahve a good question If someone has been perm banned for c-bug cause he always do it.Will they be unbanned?
-
i ahve a good question If someone has been perm banned for c-bug cause he always do it.Will they be unbanned?
I dont think anyone is every perm banned for doing that.
-
i ahve a good question If someone has been perm banned for c-bug cause he always do it.Will they be unbanned?
I dont think anyone is every perm banned for doing that.
I know one whos banned for this,NatPagle[UB]
-
i ahve a good question If someone has been perm banned for c-bug cause he always do it.Will they be unbanned?
I dont think anyone is every perm banned for doing that.
I know one whos banned for this,NatPagle[UB]
Perm banned? Link?
-
Perm banned = no unban :o
-
i ahve a good question If someone has been perm banned for c-bug cause he always do it.Will they be unbanned?
I dont think anyone is every perm banned for doing that.
I know one whos banned for this,NatPagle[UB]
Perm banned? Link?
http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12269.0.html (http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12269.0.html)
-
i ahve a good question If someone has been perm banned for c-bug cause he always do it.Will they be unbanned?
I dont think anyone is every perm banned for doing that.
I know one whos banned for this,NatPagle[UB]
Perm banned? Link?
http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12269.0.html (http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12269.0.html)
Afaik that guy dissapeared according to that topic
-
Tigro,nobody got perm ban for cbug,and never will if its not allowed,but soon it will be allowed.Nat_Pagle just didnt posted ban appeal,he got unbanned now
-
Stick to Cbug please, stop mentioning 2shot in the discussion >.>
-
I like the idea :x
-
I like the idea :x
yes from me
:)
-
@ Scott,
I just wanted to tell I dont care how anyone want to call it.
and no the questions dont answer themselves.
If you read my post completly, you saw I said yes for cbug, but not because of reasons like:
Gives admins a break
Doesn't make a difference for a nub to be killed by cbug or by sawn/tec. Actually they put up more of a fight against a cbugger.
In need of players
Cake
admins job easier
decrease amount of cocky players who cbug just to get banned
No obligation to use it.. it's your choice
these reasons does not make much sense to me.
The ppl who just do cbug to get banned, will find something other to get banned for.
If we really want to increase the ammount of players, we got to do things for new player, so they can get faster a nice start. It doesnt motivate totally new player if another can shoot faster with his deagle than him.
We got so few players, so many mods/admins, a lot of help by lwbot & co... Its not as much work as it used to be. I can not support a rulechange where players get banned for, because admins would have less work.
Everything is your choise... if you switch or dont, if you helikill or not, if you driveby or not... even if we would allow cheats (which we will sure never allow) it would be your choise... so this cant be a reason to change a rule.
In times of helikilling/drivebying/switching/ /stop abuse ... it does not make real sense to disallow c-bug.
@honda, I would love if we could disable switching and cbug. I already played when lw`s was know as server where bugs are not allowed. And I loved the gameplay, it was a lil more tactical, and players didnt need to train any bug... I think it feels better without and its even easier for new player. +who is interessted in training any bug/technique to have an advantage in a game? Samp is difficult enough for new players. I do not think learning to bug abuse will get more players. I like skillz like aiming driving, running,... but things you usually dont learn from singleplayer...
But the times changed we allowed switching, and as I said when we allowed, it doesnt make sense to allow switching but not allowing cbug...
-
Yes from me, it would be great to use c bug, because there would be more ways to play.
-
Yes!
So I can't get banned anymore! (Example: 6 Months ban for cbug!)
-
i voted yes as long as the pricks dont come in to flame others from other servers that are annoying ::) i enjoy cbug but i dont rlly like flamers..
-
Yes!
So I can't get banned anymore! (Example: 6 Months ban for cbug!)
longest 6 months of ur life bro lol
-
Yes!
So I can't get banned anymore! (Example: 6 Months ban for cbug!)
longest 6 months of ur life bro lol
lol, ye it kinda was.. I used to be very active on LW those days..
After I got banned I started playing on LVP..
-
Yes!
So I can't get banned anymore! (Example: 6 Months ban for cbug!)
longest 6 months of ur life bro lol
See if c0bug would of been allowed we owuld of had probably more regulars lol
lol, ye it kinda was.. I used to be very active on LW those days..
After I got banned I started playing on LVP..
-
Also it may be hard for some people to believe, but when people are used to cbugging, it sometimes happens by accident.
Allowing switching and allowing cbug, again as in the 2shot case, are very different things.
-
I vote no for cbug cuz there will be more and more flamers,no cuz i dont know iti know using this shit
-
I voted no - C-bug probably wont add any more players to the sever (imo). Most cbuggers also do all other sa-mp 'bugs' and therefore play on other servers. Allowing C-bug may raise the player count a lil but players will leave if C-bug is introduced. Unfortunatly it like a double edgded sword
Allow it = gian and loss.
Dont allow it = no loss and no gain
I already played when lw`s was know as server where bugs are not allowed. And I loved the gameplay, it was a lil more tactical, and players didnt need to train any bug... I think it feels better without and its even easier for new player.
I remember the old days with fire extinguishers aswell. Sigh i miss the no c-bug/switching. I played on a server with no cbug/switching/etc and forgot how fun it was and how th efights lasted longer and were better (imo).
Also remember that non one took my sheep back then, esp V3 - damn Sheep Stealer!
-
majority agreed to make it legal, so maybe Management will make it official?
-
who voted no? im gonna rape his mum.
-
How many topics was existing like this ? and all where denied .
and now one admin suggest and it get accepted ? ..
in my eyes you should have accepted it then before.
Or u just all accept cause u dont want to denie a suggest of an admin ?
I rly dont care about cbug or not cause evenw ith cbug i think lw`s will never be a ww server cause even with cbug rw still kill them.
-
NO.
Less bugs = better gameplay
-
who voted no?
I voted no
-
who voted no?
I voted no
i voted no.
-
How many topics was existing like this ? and all where denied .
and now one admin suggest and it get accepted ? ..
in my eyes you should have accepted it then before.
Or u just all accept cause u dont want to denie a suggest of an admin ?
I rly dont care about cbug or not cause evenw ith cbug i think lw`s will never be a ww server cause even with cbug rw still kill them.
What?
If a player made a poll like this I'd vote yes and so would alot of other people. Afaik, people in general don't give a shit if an admin has a suggestion, they care about the suggestion. So I highly doubt 42 people up until now have voted yes just to 'make me happy'; honestly this is the most retarded thing I've read in the whole topic.
Allowing cbug wont make it a ww server, who said that? This server is rw and ww, hence rw prevails and always will..
-
When we just had 4shot no switch il was easier for newbs with deagle's beating them, but since switch got allowed its not fun more for ppl with deagle ALLOWED c-bug and it will be a more epic battle! the server needs this.
-
who voted no?
I voted no
i voted no.
I voted no.
-
Im looking for good arguments to NOT allow c bug and I cant find any good in this topic.
"It's a bug, we shouldn't eploit bugs" This game is full of bugs. For me cbug, double shot, switching - theyre all just ways of fight. I know, Im just calling them nicely, but I don't see them to be more a bug than dbing. Both are just increasing the shooting speed :P
"It's not realistic" Shit, I dunno why Im even commenting this. Have u ever seen a realistic movie in which people are running in a circle with uzis, instead of camping behind a wall or something? I don't think so. RW wars in samp are not realistic, lets make WW unrealistic too then.
"It has been denied loads of time" Yeah, but situation is changing all the time. It was denied when there was 80+ ppl every evening and 120+ every saturday. Now it's 30-50 every evening and 50-80 every saturday. We need to do what we can to attract new players.
"Less bugs = better gameplay" I don't understand this one.
I think that c bug is needed for balance between rw and ww.
-
who voted no?
I voted no
i voted no.
I voted no.
I voted no.
-
Not-allowing cbug is indeed lowering playercounts, for example I dont play at LW anymore cos i get banned for cbug too fast. Just my last ban by Rizla, i joined the server, shot 2-3 random cbug bullets cos it was just a reflex (cos im that used to it and forgot about the LW rule) and got an instant ban like 10 secs after i joined. Gay.
But w/e some people here dont get that cbug is more a defense thing and not something to attack with. It basically helps you in a fight vs RW players cos you can move faster after firing a bullet.
-
actually i decided to change my vote to no because i learned with cbug comers way to much flame and i dont like it so nvm changed my vote to no
-
When we just had 4shot no switch il was easier for newbs with deagle's beating them, but since switch got allowed its not fun more for ppl with deagle ALLOWED c-bug and it will be a more epic battle! the server needs this.
Newbs with a deagle still wont know how to c-bug so by allowing it, it will not help new players. It will only help players who know how to use the bug and most newbs/new players do not know how to c-bug.
Off topic a bit:
I voted no.
Thats how close me and V3 are - we vote the same now :D HE IS MINE! :D
-
Newbs with a deagle still wont know how to c-bug so by allowing it, it will not help new players. It will only help players who know how to use the bug and most newbs/new players do not know how to c-bug.
Lots of people join LW's and never joined before but have been on other servers where they're used to cbugging.
-
I vote no for cbug cuz there will be more and more flamers,no cuz i dont know iti know using this shit
Kind of makes no sense...C-bug attracts flamers or wot ?D:
Edit:
I voted no - C-bug probably wont add any more players to the sever (imo).
@ACE, I guess it does add more players, I mean imagine what will happen if GTA:T and SFR disallowed C-bug, noone would play on it then, so I think that it will attracts a LOT of more players.
-
who voted no?
I voted no
i voted no.
I voted no.
I voted no.
then you all know whats happening to your mum. :P
Anyway, tell me guys when it gets accepted, because "yes" is owning.
-
This could also attract ''bigger'' and more ''serious'' clans who actually play both (rw and ww) on a high level.
-
This could also attract ''bigger'' and more ''serious'' clans who actually play both (rw and ww) on a high level.
ding ding ding. Winnar.
-
I support the "allow cbug"-movement, but I don't think 40 people voting yes, is going to suffice to actually get the rule changed. 40 people aren't enough to represent the LW community, imo. More people should vote, so it can be taken into serious consideration and further discussing. And maybe actually get this show on the road..
-
I don't know how to C-Bug so:
"I don't give 2 shits"
:)
-
8.cake
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
with your dam good skills to get people to say yes
EDIT:how to cbug?
U LAVE UNDER A ROCK
1.hold aim
2.shoot and quickly press the c key
there 2 steps now go and get banned!
-
OOOHHH YES!!!
I voted +1 of course ! ;)
-
Just my last ban by Rizla, i joined the server, shot 2-3 random cbug bullets cos it was just a reflex (cos im that used to it and forgot about the LW rule) and got an instant ban like 10 secs after i joined. Gay.
stick to facts please, if possible.
-
Just my last ban by Rizla, i joined the server, shot 2-3 random cbug bullets cos it was just a reflex (cos im that used to it and forgot about the LW rule) and got an instant ban like 10 secs after i joined. Gay.
stick to facts please, if possible.
Its a fact :)
Joined, spawned, walked for about 3 seconds then some dude on a police bike (if i remember it right) was driving along, shot 1-2 bullets at him, then he got off his bike started shooting at me, i shot another 1-2 bullets and then i got banned. All in all my ingame time was between 5-20 seconds
-
Just my last ban by Rizla, i joined the server, shot 2-3 random cbug bullets cos it was just a reflex (cos im that used to it and forgot about the LW rule) and got an instant ban like 10 secs after i joined. Gay.
stick to facts please, if possible.
Its a fact :)
Joined, spawned, walked for about 3 seconds then some dude on a police bike (if i remember it right) was driving along, shot 1-2 bullets at him, then he got off his bike started shooting at me, i shot another 1-2 bullets and then i got banned. All in all my ingame time was between 5-20 seconds
ok well .... since i have some spare time i'll prove my point. (btw surely u must have saw our textdraw full of rules when u joined)
(16:17:05) ‹+ILickTurtles› [27] *** (UvH)Hitman has joined the game.
(16:17:57) ‹+ILickTurtles› *** Suspected cbug: (UvH)Hitman (ID: 27)
(16:28:16) ‹+IHateTurtles› *** Suspected cbug: (UvH)Hitman (ID: 27)
(16:28:17) ‹+ILoveTurtles› *** Suspected cbug: (UvH)Hitman (ID: 27)
(16:28:22) ‹+ILickTurtles› *** Suspected cbug: (UvH)Hitman (ID: 27)
(16:28:25) ‹+ILoveTurtles› *** Suspected cbug: (UvH)Hitman (ID: 27)
(16:28:29) ‹+IKillTurtles› * ItsRizlaBitch (ID: 38) has brought (UvH)Hitman (ID: 27) to themself.
(16:28:32) ‹+ILoveTurtles› * ItsRizlaBitch (ID: 38) has brought (UvH)Hitman (ID: 27) to themself.
(16:28:33) ‹+IHateTurtles› [27] (UvH)Hitman: wut
(16:28:38) ‹+ILickTurtles› [27] (UvH)Hitman: what about gtfo admin
(16:28:40) ‹+ILoveTurtles› [38] ItsRizlaBitch: hitman
(16:28:44) ‹+ILickTurtles› [38] ItsRizlaBitch: no cbug
(16:28:46) ‹+ILikeTurtles› [27] (UvH)Hitman: dude
(16:28:49) ‹+IHateTurtles› [38] ItsRizlaBitch: kthx
(16:28:49) ‹+ILickTurtles› [27] (UvH)Hitman: i aimed at a fucking wall
(16:28:53) ‹+IKillTurtles› [27] (UvH)Hitman: not a guy
(16:28:54) ‹+ILoveTurtles› [38] ItsRizlaBitch: i dont care
(16:28:55) ‹+ILikeTurtles› [12] (UvH)Zetch.12: "no cbug" faggits
(16:29:00) ‹+ILoveTurtles› [38] ItsRizlaBitch: no cbug
All in all my ingame time was between 5-20 seconds
8)
-
err Rizla that ban was like months ago
im talking about the one i got on 24-27th jan (not sure about the date or so)
dont even know what admin banned me but it was said to me that it was you
edit: http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12259.0.html (http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12259.0.html)
PS: 8)
(https://littlewhiteys.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftwilight.mahoro-net.org%2F%7Efck%2Fthread_direction.gif&hash=9e40faf931fabd31009ee536ea47dd438aeafc0f)
-
ive posted logs of your last ban by me.
http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12259.0.html (http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12259.0.html)
no idea what this is, when it was, what it was for or who done it
no one said i banned u on that date
-
ive posted logs of your last ban by me.
http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12259.0.html (http://forum.littlewhiteys.co.uk/index.php/topic,12259.0.html)
no idea what this is, when it was, what it was for or who done it
no one said i banned u on that date
Well i was told that you banned me and also your name got edited in my topic title (i said unknown admin/dunno).
-
D: KEEP ON TOPIC OR ALK ABOUT SHEEP - either way idk :D
Down with C-BUG! Up with SHEEP! :D
-
look how much posts in 3 days lol
if you ask me allow cbug
-
cbug won't get bring in more flamers and so on. cbug is just awesome and i am sure people will get used to it and it will attract new clans into lw. :)
-
cbug won't get bring in more flamers and so on. cbug is just awesome and i am sure people will get used to it and it will attract new clans into lw. :)
Alvar for president!!
-
Seriously, why should we deny this suggestion:
1. ''Noobs dont know how to c-bug''
Noobs also dont know how to switch
2. ''Cbug is an exploit in the game and it shouldnt be abused''
So is switching
3. ''Many noobs switch without knowing''
Yeah sure, i dont see my 14-yr old nephew switching
Give me a reason, and ill give you a reason why you are wrong.
-
cbug won't get bring in more flamers and so on. cbug is just awesome and i am sure people will get used to it and it will attract new clans into lw. :)
are u sure for flamers? try play with BoD's on sfr...
-
cbug won't get bring in more flamers and so on. cbug is just awesome and i am sure people will get used to it and it will attract new clans into lw. :)
are u sure for flamers? try play with BoD's on sfr...
aah the most flamers in bod are also hackers so dont mind.
-
There's flamers already without cbug.
-
cbug won't get bring in more flamers and so on. cbug is just awesome and i am sure people will get used to it and it will attract new clans into lw. :)
are u sure for flamers? try play with BoD's on sfr...
your gay way to play getting killing sprees makes them rage.
-
cbug won't get bring in more flamers and so on. cbug is just awesome and i am sure people will get used to it and it will attract new clans into lw. :)
are u sure for flamers? try play with BoD's on sfr...
excessive flaming gets you bant anyways, so where is the problem?
-
cbug won't get bring in more flamers and so on. cbug is just awesome and i am sure people will get used to it and it will attract new clans into lw. :)
are u sure for flamers? try play with BoD's on sfr...
excessive flaming gets you bant anyways, so where is the problem?
Ah, allright...twister <3
-
cbug won't get bring in more flamers and so on. cbug is just awesome and i am sure people will get used to it and it will attract new clans into lw. :)
are u sure for flamers? try play with BoD's on sfr...
Why would cbug get more flamers? Thats like saying allowing the dildo as gun will bring in more females to the server. Bullshit
-
allowing the dildo as gun will bring in more females to the server.
Gentlemen, I guess we have a new mission to accomplish.
-
I still can not see c-bug bringing in more players. Clans generally stick to the servers they know, new players will not be atttracted by c-bug (cus they probably dont know how to use it).
I also think allowing c-bug will also cause players to leave so whilst we may get a few new players 'older' players will leave so it wont make a diffrence.
Just my view, now i agree with dom,
allowing the dildo as gun will bring in more females to the server.
Gentlemen, I guess we have a new mission to accomplish.
]
We must make the dildo gun and try to bring in new female players in this way!!
-
[...] Thats like saying allowing the dildo as gun will bring in more females to the server. Bullshit
It`s worth a try, would like to see more females rapping boys on lw`s.
-
I'm locking the vote for now, since this will be further discussed within the staff, thank you all for the interesting points of view and all the people who voted.
-
Yeah, thanks for that :)
-
cbug shouldnt be allow its just more confusion, admins would mistake it for hacks and all that
-
cbug shouldnt be allow its just more confusion, admins would mistake it for hacks and all that
Not possible to mistake it as a hack
-
lol alfguy, you being banned for minigun hacks had nothing to do with cbug, so gg
-
lol alfguy, you being banned for minigun hacks had nothing to do with cbug, so gg
ROFL
-
So many reasons.. lots of the ww'ers would be free.
1 - Would place another level of balance between ww and rw, and now with 4shot allowed, it's even more needed imo
2 - WW Clans use cbug, more clans is more fun
3 - Gives admins a break
4 - Players like it
5 - Doesn't make a difference for a nub to be killed by cbug or by sawn/tec. Actually they put up more of a fight against a cbugger
6 - No obligation to use it.. it's your choice
7 - In need of players
8 - Cake
Btw, I'm posting this as a player, not in the name of the admin team. It's something that occured to me and alot of other players but it's not anything that's been recently discussed within the staff.
4 - Players like it
I do not like it
-
Have you really noticed a difference?? Omg 80% of the server still use RW (maybe sometimes they make a duel with cbug, thats all), I think this disscusion is useless.
-
It's better with cbug, people who like ww can use it, and the ones who like rw aren't affected in the least.
-
Seeing as c-bug is now allowed, this topic is now unpinned.
-
very cool, i was waiting for this since a lot :)