Poll

How do you like this suggestion?

Good idea.
Bad idea.
Ok, but need modification.

Author Topic: Player Server Moderating  (Read 9349 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Quickplay

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2212
  • Crazy Mind
    • Awards
  • SA-MP: Quickplay
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #30 on: December 20, 2009, 11:53:49 PM »
the risk of this idea is that these "power players" could abuse of their powers, so i don't know if it's a good idea...
i'm an old player of LW and i saw a lot of old players doing bad things throughout these 2 years..

for example i'd like to be one of these players if the suggestion had been accepted, cause often cheaters/abusers don't get banned due to no admin presence..but like i already said i'm worried about the risk of someone's abuse

Votekicks/bans are probably the most abused things ive ever experienced.

that's what i meant

indeed i voted -1
« Last Edit: December 20, 2009, 11:55:39 PM by Quickplay »

Offline NiGHTM4RE

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 1015
  • Bow down or draw your sawns...
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #31 on: December 21, 2009, 04:25:52 AM »
i like the idea except for the spectate command...
NiGHTM4RE's YouTube Channel
Find me in The Real World crypto investing campus.

Offline chocolate_bro

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 17
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #32 on: December 21, 2009, 12:20:46 PM »
i vote -1 on this!

Sorry but i dont see how these "trusted players" are trusted? what by playing 300 hours means that u are a trusted player? hmm dont think so...

Also i think that these "power players" will just end up kicking anyone they feel like, fo no reason apparat from personal reasons. For example i DB half the UB people and they start flaming, next i flame them back, then i will be kicked becasue they will all vote to kick/ban becasue they are in the majority and can do so...

My point is that these "power/trusted players" are often sour about being killed (especially in DB way) and in my opinion they will force other "trusted players" to vote kick/ban just becasue they feel like...

yes i am specifically refering to the UB people, who seem to have it in for me!!!

besides, would it no be easier to just recruit some more admins/moderators... So if they do ban someone wrongfully the blame is on their shoulders and its their responsibility... not like 8 other players who will never own up if they banned someone incorrectly.

P.S also admins you will get a lot more post in the banned section, so in reality ur workload will not decrease that much, it could actually go up if you have to chase up the people who banned some one incorrectly... imagine that trying to identify 8 players who were involved and then deciding how to punish them... 

Peace out


Offline AJP

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4900
  • N1158Q
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #33 on: December 21, 2009, 12:47:02 PM »
The idea isn't for ban tho, it's for kicking.

Offline chocolate_bro

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 17
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #34 on: December 21, 2009, 12:59:32 PM »
The idea isn't for ban tho, it's for kicking.

ok in which case i really dont see the need for it... if its actually a legitamate kick for hacking, then there is nothing stopping the hacker comming back in. rendering it pretty useless...

Offline HASEEB1

  • Big Fish
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
  • Nothing is true.Everything is permissible!
    • gtaassassins
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #35 on: December 21, 2009, 01:58:22 PM »
The idea isn't for ban tho, it's for kicking.
Then accept it

Offline Alvar

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 1884
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #36 on: December 21, 2009, 02:00:44 PM »
I doubt this will happen.
Easy isn't always simple.

Offline chocolate_bro

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 17
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #37 on: December 21, 2009, 03:32:16 PM »
The idea isn't for ban tho, it's for kicking.
Then accept it

no, why implement something thats as useless as this...?

agreed with Alvar, doubt it would happen...

Offline AJP

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4900
  • N1158Q
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #38 on: December 21, 2009, 05:49:22 PM »
To be honest I don't think it's a bad idea, but on the other hand I know some regulars abuse shit and break the rules when no admins are on. I'm waiting for the next major game mode update (which is comming) for suggestions such as these.

Offline callme whatever you want

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #39 on: December 21, 2009, 07:54:47 PM »
I think this should be forgotten as the second sex in your life..... If the powerplayers will be choosen by admin then why we dont name them as moderators. And if we need more assistance in dealing with /reports and shit then why admins easily just pick some guys to be moderators or anything? There is no point giving moderators a new name. And if you get auto power player in 300 hours or whatever then there will be always abusing. like kick some guys who has luck and just doing lame things and everyone hate him because he is so lucky and also cocky.... no way..  i think...  its only just a claim to get some power.... i dont play this game to control and play the dad of other players. admin assistance is good enough since you see a ban every minute ...

Offline [Apoc4lypZe]

  • Kiddy Fish
  • **
  • Posts: 57
    • .i. -_- .i.
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #40 on: December 23, 2009, 05:04:23 AM »
-1 very bad suggestion

Offline [AiRMaX]

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 76
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #41 on: December 23, 2009, 01:25:08 PM »
I'm neutral on this suggestion.

Also, I don't think it will happen.

Offline [JOKER]Miczi

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • Posts: 1365
  • Proud LW player since SA-MP 0,1b
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #42 on: January 06, 2010, 07:56:12 PM »
Power player idea sucks, thats sure. But the idea is not so stupid at all. As a gay above me said (ill call u whatever i want, as u wish) there is no need to give moderators a new name. /votekick should be able for every registered player.
 
Ill explain how I see it. First of all, vote cant be started if the player count is less than 20 or something like that. The less player count, the bigger chance of abuse. The player, who see a cheater/rulebreaker uses /votekick id. Here I dunno: maybe the information that someone voted should be posted on a global chat, maybe it should be secret. If 50% of the players will vote, then the player is kicked.
I think there should be a restriction, for eg. that we can make one vote for hour or more, so the player will think twice before voting to kick someone for hh, when hes got just hard hb.

HOWEVER, I don't really think it's very needed on LW. The anticheat systems are really good and there is ussually an admin arround. Making power players is the worst idea even, cause if admins have to choose them, itll be just an another type of mod. If they will be choosen automaticly, eg. after reaching 300 hour, there would be a lot of abusers.


Offline CranK_Max

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 525
  • [CranK] Max
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #43 on: January 13, 2010, 03:09:25 PM »
I accept if someone says there is no need. It IS no need if you are on at the evening with a lot of players.
Iam thinking of times in the morning or after school. Iam often on with just 10-15 playes. 4 of them are cheaters. Last week a saw 3 of them, they made a gang called: "cheaters" . WTF LOL ?

And for those times we need new mods or "powerplayers" :/

I had to laugh xD

Offline [JOKER]Miczi

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • Posts: 1365
  • Proud LW player since SA-MP 0,1b
    • Awards
Re: Player Server Moderating
« Reply #44 on: January 14, 2010, 10:27:29 AM »
Then we need new mods, not a new kind of mode, lol. I don't know how the mods are chosen, but maybe there should be taken more attention for the timezones and time when ppl can be most active? Maybe there should be made some kind of shifts so there will be always at least 1 mod online?
Dunno, as I said I don't see need for this.