Poll

Allow it

Yes
46 (69.7%)
No
18 (27.3%)
I don't give 2 shits
2 (3%)

Total Members Voted: 64

Author Topic: [I]Cbug  (Read 24500 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline AJP

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4900
  • N1158Q
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #76 on: February 08, 2010, 05:44:40 PM »
How many topics was existing like this ? and all where denied .
and now one admin suggest and it get accepted ? ..

in my eyes you should have accepted it then before.
Or u just all accept cause u dont want to denie a suggest of an admin ?

I rly dont care about cbug or not cause evenw ith cbug i think lw`s will never be a ww server cause even with cbug rw still kill them.
What?

If a player made a poll like this I'd vote yes and so would alot of other people. Afaik, people in general don't give a shit if an admin has a suggestion, they care about the suggestion. So I highly doubt 42 people up until now have voted yes just to 'make me happy'; honestly this is the most retarded thing I've read in the whole topic.

Allowing cbug wont make it a ww server, who said that? This server is rw and ww, hence rw prevails and always will..

Offline Daniel.

  • Fisher
  • ******
  • Posts: 1196
  • It's Lonely at the Top'
    • DO NOT CLICK
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #77 on: February 08, 2010, 05:52:05 PM »
When we just had 4shot no switch il was easier for newbs with deagle's beating them, but since switch got allowed its not fun more for ppl with deagle ALLOWED c-bug and it will be a more epic battle! the server needs this.

YOU JUST LOST THE GAME!!!

Offline TypeR

  • Fish 'n' Chips
  • *****
  • Posts: 589
  • Dan dolazi,za heroje i sirotinju
    • Awards

Offline [JOKER]Miczi

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • Posts: 1365
  • Proud LW player since SA-MP 0,1b
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #79 on: February 08, 2010, 06:49:13 PM »
Im looking for good arguments to NOT allow c bug and I cant find any good in this topic.
"It's a bug, we shouldn't eploit bugs" This game is full of bugs. For me cbug, double shot, switching - theyre all just ways of fight. I know, Im just calling them nicely, but I don't see them to be more a bug than dbing. Both are just increasing the shooting speed :P
"It's not realistic" Shit, I dunno why Im even commenting this. Have u ever seen a realistic movie in which people are running in a circle with uzis, instead of camping behind a wall or something? I don't think so. RW wars in samp are not realistic, lets make WW unrealistic too then.
"It has been denied loads of time" Yeah, but situation is changing all the time. It was denied when there was 80+ ppl every evening and 120+ every saturday. Now it's 30-50 every evening and 50-80 every saturday. We need to do what we can to attract new players.
"Less bugs = better gameplay" I don't understand this one.

I think that c bug is needed for balance between rw and ww.



Offline UvH Clan

  • Adult Fish
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
  • Ultra violent Hooligans
    • Ultra violent Hooligans
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #81 on: February 08, 2010, 07:14:08 PM »
Not-allowing cbug is indeed lowering playercounts, for example  I dont play at LW anymore cos i get banned for cbug too fast. Just my last ban by Rizla, i joined the server, shot 2-3 random cbug bullets cos it was just a reflex (cos im that used to it and forgot about the LW rule) and got an instant ban like 10 secs after i joined. Gay.

But w/e some people here dont get that cbug is more a defense thing and not something to attack with. It basically helps you in a fight vs RW players cos you can move faster after firing a bullet.


Offline iMJets

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 2165
  • .::[UB]::. Clan Founder
    • [UnBreakables] Clan Forums
    • Awards
  • SA-MP: Jets[UB]
Re: Cbug
« Reply #82 on: February 08, 2010, 08:00:43 PM »
actually i decided to change my vote to no because i learned with cbug comers way to much flame and i dont like it so nvm changed my vote to no

Offline [V]ACE

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 1536
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #83 on: February 08, 2010, 08:47:00 PM »
When we just had 4shot no switch il was easier for newbs with deagle's beating them, but since switch got allowed its not fun more for ppl with deagle ALLOWED c-bug and it will be a more epic battle! the server needs this.


Newbs with a deagle still wont know how to c-bug so by allowing it, it will not help new players. It will only help players who know how to use the bug and most newbs/new players do not know how to c-bug.

Off topic a bit:
I voted no.

Thats how close me and V3 are - we vote the same now :D HE IS MINE! :D


TOP-SAMP

Offline AJP

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4900
  • N1158Q
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #84 on: February 08, 2010, 09:05:56 PM »
Newbs with a deagle still wont know how to c-bug so by allowing it, it will not help new players. It will only help players who know how to use the bug and most newbs/new players do not know how to c-bug.
Lots of people join LW's and never joined before but have been on other servers where they're used to cbugging.

Offline Bloodst3r

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 566
  • Had a dream I was king. I woke up, still king.
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #85 on: February 08, 2010, 09:31:13 PM »
I vote no for cbug cuz there will be more and more flamers,no cuz i dont know iti know using this shit

Kind of makes no sense...C-bug attracts flamers or wot ?D:

Edit:

Quote
I voted no - C-bug probably wont add any more players to the sever (imo).

@ACE, I guess it does add more players, I mean imagine what will happen if GTA:T and SFR disallowed C-bug, noone would play on it then, so I think that it will attracts a LOT of more players.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2010, 09:34:08 PM by BLoODsT3R »

Offline [V]Tw1sT3r

  • Big Fish
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
  • I CAN SEE U
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #86 on: February 08, 2010, 09:33:16 PM »
« Last Edit: February 08, 2010, 09:38:01 PM by (UvH)Tw1sT3r »

Offline Dominator

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 1937
  • sup
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #87 on: February 08, 2010, 09:49:22 PM »
This could also attract ''bigger'' and more ''serious'' clans who actually play both (rw and ww) on a high level.
well dominator is still the fucked up forum whore he always was, i am glad that i never see u somewhere ingame.

Offline AJP

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4900
  • N1158Q
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #88 on: February 08, 2010, 11:08:00 PM »
This could also attract ''bigger'' and more ''serious'' clans who actually play both (rw and ww) on a high level.

ding ding ding. Winnar.

Offline Faraday

  • The Scranton Strangler
  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2599
  • Super[M]unkey
    • Awards
Re: Cbug
« Reply #89 on: February 08, 2010, 11:19:11 PM »
I support the "allow cbug"-movement, but I don't think 40 people voting yes, is going to suffice to actually get the rule changed. 40 people aren't enough to represent the LW community, imo. More people should vote, so it can be taken into serious consideration and further discussing. And maybe actually get this show on the road..