Author Topic: the question is  (Read 4756 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline [JOKER]sugar

  • Adult Fish
  • ***
  • Posts: 232
  • i finally found a cool avatar but it aint working
    • Awards
Re: the question is
« Reply #15 on: October 10, 2008, 10:46:44 AM »
it just pisses me off reeeeeeely pisses me off !



if it aint what i wanna hear then dont say nothing at all x

Offline Michelle

  • Adult Fish
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
    • Awards
Re: the question is
« Reply #16 on: October 10, 2008, 12:21:08 PM »
it seems as that peoples backs is already up on this topic.

every time something is mentiond about things that havnt been done as they should, people always suggest go to higher admins, sometimes thats dosnt make a diff, sometimes things get delt with when there more public, if there is a problem why should it be hidden away?

if someone dosnt agree, why hide how you feel, bush it under the carpet, as long as there isnt any flaming involved or any personal rudness like what lilly has had to witness, then why cant admin hold there hands up and accept the critisism,

ban appeals, when someone posts in a ban appeal when its not about them, there posts used to get deleted.
can you impliment the same procedures for the 20% of people who dont wanna flame the admins but would like a amicable discussion and they can learn from mistakes, or take this oppotuinity to defend there self, if they truly belive the critisism is wrong, coz we have to admit that not all critisism is right, sometimes its just ppl who are angry and misunderstand. but there should be more communication between players and admins, least that way things might be handled better

just my opinion, but perhaps worth a try, i know that they used to be a admin abuse post thing before and it was removed after a week i think, but instead of closing or deleting topics just monitor them a bit more, and if someone think you have done something wrong, dont get your back up staright away, remeber there is a reason why this person has this assumption.

* Rizla is now known as im-a-donkey
<&im-a-donkey> eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
<&im-a-donkey> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw

Offline [V]ACE

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 1536
    • Awards
Re: the question is
« Reply #17 on: October 10, 2008, 02:48:34 PM »

[quote author = ACE]However, i also feel that it is better to deal with critism, and in the future take it into account. I mean in all walks of life we get critised (deserved or not lol) and many of us dont ignore it (unless it is complete BS) we use it and remember it for the future and learn from it. (Just my opinion).

A "constructive" comment made by a reg from LW to me over pm on irc:

"Why are you such a shit admin? You cant tell the difference between bugs <then a long explination of how they didnt switch when I had caught them whilst a ADMIN was fighting them>, I really hope you get cancer and die you fucking stupid whore"

This is the average constructive criticism I get from the average player now a days. Really makes me want to stay on the team.... Im not sure what the rest of the team get, it may be better it may be worse.

[/quote]
I agree that is not constuctive critism. Most critism is from noobs/cheaters/haxors/etc... and should definatly be ignored. Thats why i wrote in that we ignore any BS from anyone in life. One question is why cant we have a topic on admins/mods/management with only constructive/gd comments (i.e. all flaming comments removed)

it seems as that peoples backs is already up on this topic.

if there is a problem why should it be hidden away?

if someone dosnt agree, why hide how you feel, bush it under the carpet, as long as there isnt any flaming involved or any personal rudness like what lilly has had to witness, then why cant admin hold there hands up and accept the critisism,
Agreed.


TOP-SAMP