littlewhitey's Servers Forum (SA-MP/VC-MP/MTA/Zomboid)

Recycle Bin => Suggestions (2008-2011) => SA-MP Archive (2015) => SA-MP Archive => Recycle Bin => Rejected Suggestions => Topic started by: Bloodst3r on October 12, 2009, 07:02:43 PM

Title: [REJECTED]Permissions.
Post by: Bloodst3r on October 12, 2009, 07:02:43 PM: Hey Everbody,

I was thinking that it really gets annoying when there is no online admins and no responce from IRC admins since they're AFK, So I thought maybe managment members could give some kind of permissions for Regulars, or Trusted players ONLY to vote to kick him or not, when 3 / 5 votes says yes he gets kicked / banned, and if it appears that he wasnt cheating, all of the players who voted yes loose their permission for voting and gets like 1 day ban or so.

I think its a pretty good idea.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: Alvar on October 12, 2009, 07:06:29 PM: I don't see this helping. No doubt some people would abuse it + think how much beggers there will be "Can I get that permission also" all the damn time. Every person in LW probably thinks that his trusted person.

-1
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: xGuiNnesSx on October 12, 2009, 07:39:13 PM: if some clan member would be mad he could ask his mates to help him get someone banned :o :o
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: tony_ab on October 12, 2009, 07:40:55 PM: :P dunno what to say lol, but i think this could actually be good :P
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: Bloodst3r on October 12, 2009, 07:42:21 PM: Quote from: xGuiNnesSx on October 12, 2009, 07:39:13 PM
if some clan member would be mad he could ask his mates to help him get someone banned :o :o

Quote from: BLoODsT3R on October 12, 2009, 07:02:43 PM
and if it appears that he wasnt cheating, all of the players who voted yes loose their permission for voting and gets like 1 day ban or so.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: Sunstreaker on October 12, 2009, 10:54:08 PM: yea its bad idea -1
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: Hyp3r on October 13, 2009, 12:55:38 AM: I think that it is a good idea but it can be abused. I don't agree with the idea of banning people for abusing it, people should get a penalty like temporary removal of voting rights.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: enkei on October 13, 2009, 03:43:04 AM: How about you make more people admins? So there is always one online. Perhaps assign administrative privledges to people in different countries, so there is usually one online during all times of a day.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: robbynab on October 13, 2009, 09:17:16 AM: Quote from: enkei on October 13, 2009, 03:43:04 AM
How about you make more people admins? So there is always one online.

Would be the best solution, though I think there are enough admins, but some are inactive.
Anyways, -1337 for Bloods.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: AJP on October 13, 2009, 02:15:11 PM: That's what mods are for
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: [Shade] on October 13, 2009, 07:48:32 PM: Yes, i agree. There aren't a lot of admins on - and if they are, its always the same few (2-4) different admins.

Tbh the only really active admins i see are, Scott, s3rs, Ace, Rizla..

And the only active mod is Shadow :o

So yeah, LWs have enough admins, but we dont have enough active admins. We only have 4 mods, so instead of permissions i think there should be a lot more mods.. maybe 8 mods in total so there is a higher chance of one mod/admin always being online.

Just my thought.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: AJP on October 13, 2009, 08:34:49 PM: Well I wont go into details but we've already been looking into this for a while.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: robbynab on October 13, 2009, 08:56:18 PM: /me smells new mods :P
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: enkei on October 14, 2009, 12:27:32 AM: Whats the difference between an admin and a mod?
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: Me[T]aL_ on October 14, 2009, 01:48:13 AM: Quote from: enkei on October 14, 2009, 12:27:32 AM
Whats the difference between an admin and a mod?
admins have a higher level than mods.
so jsut make new ppl mods or better yet
fraps+pics=post on cheater section of forums >.>
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: Sunstreaker on October 14, 2009, 02:02:28 AM: yea example the mods cant ban the admin can i thing :P
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: robbynab on October 14, 2009, 09:04:20 AM: Quote from: enkei on October 14, 2009, 12:27:32 AM
Whats the difference between an admin and a mod?

Admins got more commands than mods, /ban, for example.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: CranK_Max on October 14, 2009, 12:35:08 PM: But it´s right ! When iam comming from school, don´t know what time it is than in England/America etc. But all English Admins arent on. Alltime when iam playing there is Noooooooo One :). (ok alot of cheaters :P )

But back to your suggestion:), I accept with others that it could get alot of abusers.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: iLz.tHO on October 14, 2009, 10:49:18 PM: I think the same that Crank_Max, about 9 - 10 o'clock (+1 GTM) there are a lot of fuckers cheaters (the majority russians) and no admins online... but the same like all, the suggestion can get abuses.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: Me[T]aL_ on October 14, 2009, 11:39:29 PM: Quote from: (UvH)Zetch on October 14, 2009, 10:49:18 PM
I think the same that Crank_Max, about 9 - 10 o'clock (+1 GTM) there are a lot of fuckers cheaters (the majority russians) and no admins online... but the same like all, the suggestion can get abuses.
what about letting only SOME commands to be used by these admins
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: AJP on October 15, 2009, 12:12:30 AM: I don't like this. If we're going to pick someone to trust with power over the rest, that's gonna be for moderator status.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: robbynab on October 15, 2009, 12:13:26 AM: Yes, and that's why this topic should be moved to Rejected Suggestions and locked.
Also change the Topic title to "Permissions. <REJECTED>", kthxbai.
Title: Re: Permissions.
Post by: CranK_Max on October 15, 2009, 03:10:37 PM: Quote from: Scott on October 15, 2009, 12:12:30 AM
I don't like this. If we're going to pick someone to trust with power over the rest, that's gonna be for moderator status.

LOL right. So its a bad suggestion 8)
Title: Re: [REJECTED]Permissions.
Post by: j.king on October 15, 2009, 04:16:39 PM: had this for vcmp, on a whole didn't turn out good. Reason being when the players got unfairly killed or heli-killed they starting abusing