Poll

What day of the week should the match take place?

Friday
12 (24.5%)
Saturday
16 (32.7%)
Sunday
21 (42.9%)

Total Members Voted: 47

Author Topic: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team  (Read 135143 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline robbynab

  • Fisher
  • ******
  • Posts: 1319
  • yo'sup
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #390 on: June 02, 2010, 08:46:01 PM »
Did it ever occur to you that their not putting them in because their in SWK, but because their actually good?
If you Sadik, Abormal, Freak or anyone else wants a SWK out, I'll be the one stepping out not them as I have the least hours, stop boring us with the pointless arguing it really isn't helping.

Lol. I don't care about clan tags breh. I simply go by experience, and suggest the best players. I was under the impression that little whiteys wanted to actually win.

Don't we do. Actually Alvar is right. They might not be that good 1v1, but their teamwork is ownage. Can't deny it.

Offline Tarcida Nabduk

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 46
  • a
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #391 on: June 02, 2010, 09:09:28 PM »
if ur pro on 1v1 ur good on war or something else lols ur not retarded to shoot ur teammates
a

Offline â–ºBuRNZâ„¢

  • Fish 'n' Chips
  • *****
  • Posts: 692
  • Fish 'n' Chics
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #392 on: June 02, 2010, 09:31:40 PM »
the best guys were pa_pda and the_gun that was teamwork ... annoying but good and star and hutch are a hell of teamworkers  :)


but the opponent team barely miss a shot ..the essential  thing to win this are MOVEMENTS and aim


its not use to have a good team work if you dont have movements

« Last Edit: June 02, 2010, 09:46:25 PM by â–ºBu[R]NZâ„¢ »

Offline Sadik

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 752
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #393 on: June 02, 2010, 09:32:05 PM »
if ur pro on 1v1 ur good on war or something else lols ur not retarded to shoot ur teammates
I was thinking that too :P

Offline Dominator

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 1937
  • sup
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #394 on: June 02, 2010, 10:19:24 PM »
please benny and sadik, fuck off.
well dominator is still the fucked up forum whore he always was, i am glad that i never see u somewhere ingame.

legolas3983

  • Guest
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #395 on: June 02, 2010, 10:45:47 PM »
lol dominator dont be idiot  ;)

Offline BiG_Sm0k3

Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #396 on: June 02, 2010, 10:49:50 PM »
Starksy has problems with high pings. dont know about hutch :x

David_GER

  • Guest
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #397 on: June 02, 2010, 10:58:36 PM »
if ping laggers like nater(380 ping) and holden with about 350 can play for lvp why cant fps laggers play for lw? i still stick to what i said that i can pwn 70 % of that list and i played a lot in mini wars and other team vs team shit
so would someone duel me P-L-E-A-S-E and  you will see what am i talking about
damn you talk so much fucking bs, they may got ~350 pings cause they come from australia but they dont lag. You probably dont know how to lead aim or just can't cause of your low fps, also Nater isnt even on any list and I'm pretty sure he wont play.

Offline BiG_Sm0k3

Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #398 on: June 02, 2010, 11:04:30 PM »
if ping laggers like nater(380 ping) and holden with about 350 can play for lvp why cant fps laggers play for lw? i still stick to what i said that i can pwn 70 % of that list and i played a lot in mini wars and other team vs team shit
so would someone duel me P-L-E-A-S-E and  you will see what am i talking about
dude, do you even have an account registered in Lw's server? you want to play for us only because you wont play for lvp...

Offline Disco

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 1478
  • .
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #399 on: June 02, 2010, 11:10:47 PM »
if ping laggers like nater(380 ping) and holden with about 350 can play for lvp why cant fps laggers play for lw? i still stick to what i said that i can pwn 70 % of that list and i played a lot in mini wars and other team vs team shit
so would someone duel me P-L-E-A-S-E and  you will see what am i talking about
damn you talk so much fucking bs, they may got ~350 pings cause they come from australia but they dont lag. You probably dont know how to lead aim or just can't cause of your low fps, also Nater isnt even on any list and I'm pretty sure he wont play.

Now for all high ping and Lag is something different.

High ping = A hit box far away from the skin so harder to hit than others if they got a good running.But the hb is always the same.
Lag= A warping skin + a changing hb which isnt  realy to hit when you aim.

Offline [uL]immortaLLL

  • Adult Fish
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #400 on: June 02, 2010, 11:27:08 PM »
Yeah i played for LW in the first war zeg...and benny, i dont play as much LW as i used to of course, cus i dont play samp as much as i used to. But i still play lw more then lvp recently, so why wouldn't i play for LW? I have 75 ish hours on one account and before 0.3 i had like 5 dif accounts all with 50+ hours lol, even had one with prob 200+, if you were on the team you wouldn't be complaining. I mean damn, the first LW team was all [eVo] along with me,thegun, & specialteamz, but u didnt see a problem in that did you? 7 eVo along with 3 others  ::) ::) ::)

Offline mr.niceguy

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #401 on: June 03, 2010, 12:15:46 AM »
Fuck sake -.-' Most of u are thinking that this is a match of life and death or smthing. It's supposed to be all fun and games like in the last 2 times and not a big argument who gets to play and who doesn't. Ppl who are regularly playing on the server now deserve to fight in the match as much as someone who's played regularly some time ago. If it was about who's played the longest on the server u couldn't get 10 good fighters on either side anymore since almost everyone who used to play few years ago is inactive nowadays. And if it was like that I should probably fight for LW's then  ::)

And benny stfu since u don't know shit what "LW's lineup" should look like. It looks very good atm and I think LW's has a good possibility at beating LVP this time (atleast in ww).
I don't care what the outcome will be but I just hope everyone will have fun  :)
« Last Edit: June 03, 2010, 01:08:52 AM by mr.niceguy »

Offline Me[T]aL_

  • Fisher
  • ******
  • Posts: 1927
  • Que Pasa Am Mexican
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #402 on: June 03, 2010, 12:41:46 AM »
your saying our ww team sux?

Offline mr.niceguy

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #403 on: June 03, 2010, 01:09:44 AM »
no, meant to say ww instead of rw. But yea I think the LVP's rw team is pretty tough one to beat but u can't know what'll happen  ;)

Offline Tarcida Nabduk

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 46
  • a
    • Awards
Re: LW's vs LVP III Match ~ Team
« Reply #404 on: June 03, 2010, 05:12:18 AM »
if ping laggers like nater(380 ping) and holden with about 350 can play for lvp why cant fps laggers play for lw? i still stick to what i said that i can pwn 70 % of that list and i played a lot in mini wars and other team vs team shit
so would someone duel me P-L-E-A-S-E and  you will see what am i talking about
dude, do you even have an account registered in Lw's server? you want to play for us only because you wont play for lvp...
i bet i played more on lw than u did  ^^ this was my first server i joined (about 2 yrs ago)

and i know that nater and holden are from australia
just dont make flamewars here,dont take anything too offensive
a