Made me crack up when you said lets make it short and post an entire review xD
When i went on my search for a PC, i went to about 6 different shops, went to PC forums etc etc for help. When i got to one of the shops i had my mind set on one of those Be Quiet PSU's as it was recommended by 1 other shop. Then some guy stumbles into the shop with his PC saying his PSU burned out for the second time. Both being the exact same PSU's i was going to get. Either call that a coincidence or just stupid. But that guys PC system should have handled it. Thats when i stepped away from be Quiet.
You dont want to mess about with PSU's i bought a 650 watt PSU for this PC i have now i was recommended a 600 watt one of the same brand. And my PC peaks at 550 watt when on full load and 600 on full load when using OC settings. Which tells me i done good by getting the extra 50 watts. I also now know that its better to have a higher PSU wattage than your PC actually uses. When the PSU constantly is reaching its max it will heat up and burn out sooner than expected. Ive also asked my dad (hes a retired electrician) about what would be better to have something constantly run on its full potential or something run at half potential and some leg room. Guess what he said the half potential one ofcourse...
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-5870,2422-20.htmlI have a 5870. On full load it runs at about 400 Watts (its slightly overclocked) With that comes my CPU at 125 watts (more when overclocked) And then the rest of my PC.
Most graphics cards run a pretty high wattage these days, and the more speed they get the more power they will consume.
Powerconsumption on his GTX 550:
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2011/03/15/nvidia-geforce-gtx-550-ti-1gb-review/10Powerconsumption on the HD5770: (alot more than ur barely 100 watts right hmm ?)
http://www.techspot.com/review/209-ati-radeon-hd-5770/page11.htmlI would say 750 might be overkill unless you plan a future SLI or Crossfire setup. But 600watt is deffo the minimum for him
Ive actually had a Gigabyte motherboard myself, and i was happy with it. I just think he can do better with possible upgrades in the future.
Anyway when it comes down to the RAM, you need to both pick out the CPU and motherboard very carefully. Not only should the motherboard support the RAM speed. The CPU needs to aswell.
Heres a fact for you: * AMD FX Series CPU on this motherboard supports up to DDR3 1866MHz as its standard memory frequency.* If your motherboard supported like 2133Mhz and you picked out 2133Mhz RAM it would only run at 1866Mhz as thats what the CPU would allow. Making the RAMs potential useless.
The gigabyte board would be the better choice, but when you see that it has 2 Bios setups, incase 1 bios crashes or what ever the second one takes over. Its a good failsafe but also tells me Gigabyte is not that confident about their BIOS chipset choices...
So yea think again before accusing me of not knowing what i talk about when it comes to power consumption.... You dont even know how much yours even uses.
One last bit here: Recommending SSD now is stupid, It might be faster etc etc but the pricetag is seriously not convincing for people on a budget. He is better off using the HDDs for now (as do i) And wait for prices to drop and new SSD releases. 300 bucks for 120 gig with much more speed < 120 bucks for 2TB and less speed. Yea i got my options weighed.