« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: [REJECTED]Permissions.  (Read 8692 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bloodst3r

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 566
  • Had a dream I was king. I woke up, still king.
[REJECTED]Permissions.
« on: October 12, 2009, 07:02:43 pm »
Hey Everbody,

I was thinking that it really gets annoying when there is no online admins and no responce from IRC admins since they're AFK, So I thought maybe managment members could give some kind of permissions for Regulars, or Trusted players ONLY to vote to kick him or not, when 3 / 5 votes says yes he gets kicked / banned, and if it appears that he wasnt cheating, all of the players who voted yes loose their permission for voting and gets like 1 day ban or so.

I think its a pretty good idea.
Logged

Offline Alvar

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 1884
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2009, 07:06:29 pm »
I don't see this helping. No doubt some people would abuse it + think how much beggers there will be "Can I get that permission also" all the damn time. Every person in LW probably thinks that his trusted person.

-1
Logged
Easy isn't always simple.

Offline xGuiNnesSx

  • Tiny Fish
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2009, 07:39:13 pm »
if some clan member would be mad he could ask his mates to help him get someone banned :o :o
Logged

Offline tony_ab

  • Fish 'n' Chips
  • *****
  • Posts: 962
  • sup
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2009, 07:40:55 pm »
 :P dunno what to say lol, but i think this could actually be good :P
Logged
[V]1rU$ 4ever :)


Offline Bloodst3r

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 566
  • Had a dream I was king. I woke up, still king.
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2009, 07:42:21 pm »
Quote from: xGuiNnesSx on October 12, 2009, 07:39:13 pm
if some clan member would be mad he could ask his mates to help him get someone banned :o :o

Quote from: BLoODsT3R on October 12, 2009, 07:02:43 pm
and if it appears that he wasnt cheating, all of the players who voted yes loose their permission for voting and gets like 1 day ban or so.
Logged

Offline Sunstreaker

  • Adult Fish
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
  • UFH Para siempre
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2009, 10:54:08 pm »
yea its bad idea -1
Logged

Quote from: Gwayloc on June 06, 2011, 11:26:42 pm
also this fucking hacker UFH(c)Barricade is the biggest fucking hacker

Offline Hyp3r

  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • I'm a cheating cunt
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2009, 12:55:38 am »
I think that it is a good idea but it can be abused. I don't agree with the idea of banning people for abusing it, people should get a penalty like temporary removal of voting rights.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2009, 01:03:31 am by Hyp3r »
Logged


Offline enkei

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 647
  • On green, I'm goin' for it...
  • SA-MP: enkei
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2009, 03:43:04 am »
How about you make more people admins? So there is always one online. Perhaps assign administrative privledges to people in different countries, so there is usually one online during all times of a day.
Logged

Offline robbynab

  • Fisher
  • ******
  • Posts: 1319
  • yo'sup
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2009, 09:17:16 am »
Quote from: enkei on October 13, 2009, 03:43:04 am
How about you make more people admins? So there is always one online.

Would be the best solution, though I think there are enough admins, but some are inactive.
Anyways, -1337 for Bloods.
Logged

Offline AJP

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4900
  • N1158Q
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2009, 02:15:11 pm »
That's what mods are for
Logged

Offline [Shade]

  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 284
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2009, 07:48:32 pm »
Yes, i agree. There aren't a lot of admins on - and if they are, its always the same few (2-4) different admins.

Tbh the only really active admins i see are, Scott, s3rs, Ace, Rizla..

And the only active mod is Shadow  :o

So yeah, LWs have enough admins, but we dont have enough active admins. We only have 4 mods, so instead of permissions i think there should be a lot more mods.. maybe 8 mods in total so there is a higher chance of one mod/admin always being online.

Just my thought.

Logged

Offline AJP

  • SA-MP Retirees
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4900
  • N1158Q
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2009, 08:34:49 pm »
Well I wont go into details but we've already been looking into this for a while.
Logged

Offline robbynab

  • Fisher
  • ******
  • Posts: 1319
  • yo'sup
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2009, 08:56:18 pm »
* robbynab smells new mods :P
Logged

Offline enkei

  • SA-MP Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 647
  • On green, I'm goin' for it...
  • SA-MP: enkei
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2009, 12:27:32 am »
Whats the difference between an admin and a mod?
Logged

Offline Me[T]aL_

  • Fisher
  • ******
  • Posts: 1927
  • Que Pasa Am Mexican
Re: Permissions.
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2009, 01:48:13 am »
Quote from: enkei on October 14, 2009, 12:27:32 am
Whats the difference between an admin and a mod?
admins have a higher level than mods.
so jsut make new ppl mods or better yet
fraps+pics=post on cheater section of forums >.>
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »